Four Unlikely Contenders for Super Bowl 53

GamblingSites.com
Four Unlikely Contenders for Super Bowl 53

Any NFL team’s fortunes can change in the blink of an eye.

There is a lot to be said about big changes in a franchise’s front office or on the sidelines, while in-house player development can play a huge hand in a bad team turning into one of the league’s best.

Fans and bettors alike saw it in 2017 when the previously awful Philadelphia Eagles turned into arguably the best team in the league.

Philly was built so well under the watch of head coach Doug Pederson, too, that they were able to take down the New England Patriots in Super Bowl 52.

They got there without franchise passer Carson Wentz (torn ACL) as well, further propping up the idea of a strong team coming together for a common goal.

Developing Trend

This shouldn’t be news to NFL bettors, and it’s a spreading epidemic in the NFL.

Previous losers like the Los Angeles Rams, Jacksonville Jaguars, New Orleans Saints, and the Minnesota Vikings all rose from the ashes in 2017, morphing into legit title contenders in a matter of 365 days.

Past years have produced nice surprises, too.

The Atlanta Falcons had missed the playoffs for three straight years before exploding and reaching Super Bowl LI.

The Denver Broncos were on the last legs of the Peyton Manning era and shocked with a Super Bowl 50 win, while in that same year the Carolina Panthers got to the league’s title game, going 15-1 a year after barely qualifying for postseason play.

This isn’t to suggest it’s a guarantee that a non-playoff threat will emerge and compete for a title in 2018, let alone win it all.

It does serve as a reminder that the NFL is about as fluid of a professional sports league as it gets, and it’s important to note both the top threats and the teams that could be on the rise.

The trick, of course, is identifying which teams are about to explode into a legit title threat.

Super Bowl 53 Odds

Early signs from the top Super Bowl betting sites are that a newcomer won’t make as much noise as some did a year ago.

The New England Patriots remain the best bet to win it all in 2018 over at BetOnline, while most of the top Super Bowl 53 contenders are teams that have been on the radar for a while now.

Take a look at the latest 2018 Super Bowl odds.

New England Patriots+625
Philadelphia Eagles+800
Minnesota Vikings+1000
Pittsburgh Steelers+1200
Los Angeles Rams+1200
Green Bay Packers+1400
New Orleans Saints+1600
Jacksonville Jaguars+2000
San Francisco 49ers+2000
Houston Texans+2000
Los Angeles Chargers+2000
Atlanta Falcons+2200
New York Giants+2800
Carolina Panthers+3300
Kansas City Chiefs+3300
Oakland Raiders+3300
Dallas Cowboys+3300
Denver Broncos+3300
Baltimore Ravens+4000
Indianapolis Colts+5000
Tennessee Titans+5000
Detroit Lions+5000
Seattle Seahawks+5000
Cleveland Browns+6600
Tampa Bay Buccaneers+6600
Buffalo Bills+8000
Arizona Cardinals+7500
Washington Redskins+7500
Chicago Bears+10000
Cincinnati Bengals+10000
Miami Dolphins+10000
New York Jets+10000

The main point I’m trying to illustrate here is that Vegas favors the best teams from previous seasons and often has knee-jerk reactions to big free agency signings or draft picks.

It’s kind of their job, but looking at the top-10 Super Bowl candidates at BetOnline, eight of them were in the playoffs a year ago.

New England and Philly are rightful favorites for the AFC and NFC, while the top NFL sportsbooks probably do have it right in nailing down the main threats.

That being said, there is some obvious value available to bettors, and if this recent trend of bad/average teams rising in the ranks continues in 2018, there could be even more upside to be had.

Due to that, I’m digging through the odds and team construction to gauge which “awful” teams from 2017 and/or the past few years could make for the most interesting Super Bowl wagers.

San Francisco 49ers (+2000)

It probably all starts with the Niners, who were truly horrendous in 2017, going a paltry 1-10 through their first 11 games.

Things changed for the better once the 49ers acquired former Patriots backup signal-caller Jimmy Garoppolo, though. Jimmy G started the team’s final five games, and San Francisco responded with a 5-0 run.

During that stretch, the Niners executed far better on offense and matured on the defensive end.

Wins over the likes of the Titans, Jaguars, and Rams (all playoff teams in 2017) may have displayed San Francisco’s great and overall progress.

That doesn’t alone make the Niners a lock to compete for a title or even make the playoffs, of course. The NFC West is still pretty loaded, and the Niners are a young team with a lot of moving pieces.

Still, the 49ers added Jerick McKinnon to their offense and have some young defensive pieces that could quickly turn that side of the ball into a serious strength.

If Jimmy G is the stud passer the 49ers just paid him to be and his supporting cast rallies around him, the 49ers could offer solid value as a +2000 Super Bowl 53 bet.

Houston Texans (+2000)

I wouldn’t sleep on Houston, either. The Texans have three playoff wins in their franchise history, but they’ve been waiting for that marquee quarterback to really take them to the next level.

Injuries derailed Houston in 2017, but this year, they get back Deshaun Watson, J.J. Watt, and D’onta Foreman, all at full strength.

On paper, the Texans still have one of the nastiest defenses in the NFL. If Watt can be the pass rushing presence he used to be, the Texans will be disruptive up front, and their offense won’t feel as much pressure.

It may not matter, of course, as Watson was a true sensation as a rookie last year and could be even better in year two.

With plenty of weapons via DeAndre Hopkins, Will Fuller, Lamar Miller, and the aforementioned Foreman around him, Watson is set up to succeed.

This is without a doubt the most talented unit head coach Bill O’Brien has had since arriving in Texas back in 2014, so even though the Texans were just 4-12 last year, the expectations are great.

Again, that doesn’t make them a Super Bowl lock, but a Texans team at full strength is talented enough to make that huge leap. At +2000, there is worse Super Bowl betting value to be had this year.

Miami Dolphins (+10000)

Here’s where the Super Bowl wagering ideas start to get bold. Miami was even worse than the Niners and Texans last year, and that’s despite somehow finishing with a better record than both teams.

The Dolphins barely survived a full season of Jay Cutler, but with franchise quarterback Ryan Tannehill returning from a knee injury, Miami’s struggling offense could find new life in 2018.

Tannehill is not wanting for weapons. DeVante Parker gives him a go-to possession receiver, Kenny Stills can stretch the defense down the field, and Kenyan Drake has proven he can be an explosive, dynamic rushing threat.

That’s not even factoring in the presence of veteran running back Frank Gore, rookie rusher Kalen Ballage, or slot demon Danny Amendola.

Head coach Adam Gase finally has all of the weapons in place to construct a creative and opportunistic offense, while the Fins have gotten better on the defensive side of the ball as well.

Rookie defensive back Minkah Fitzpatrick adds to a somewhat underrated Miami defense that may have the pieces in place to perform better if their offense can take the next step.

Overall, Miami is certainly tough to trust. However, if Gase can put the offense in position to succeed, the Dolphins could be a far more balanced and effective group than we saw a year ago.

Chicago Bears (+10000)

Of every possible Super Bowl 53 sleeper, the Bears might be my favorite. Chicago showed glimpses of brilliance in 2017, as they were a very young group across the board and were still very competitive for much of the year.

The Bears started a rookie quarterback in a year where John Fox was obviously a lame duck coach, yet they still won five games and stayed within one touchdown in six of their 11 losses.

Second-year passer Mitchell Trubisky is the clear key to this whole thing, but there is real optimism he breaks out in 2018 for three reasons.

Offensive guru Matt Nagy takes over as head coach Chicago can run the football Trubisky finally has legit weapons

The first one is probably the biggest deal, as Nagy led a very dynamic Chiefs offense and brings a creative scheme to the table.

Nagy has some offensive talent to work with, too.

Obviously Trubisky has a good arm and can make plays on the run, but the Bears brought in solid free agents like Allen Robinson and Trey Burton, while former 1st-round pick Kevin White still has a chance to pan out in the best system he’s seen as a pro.

Chicago already showed serious signs of improvement in 2017, as their running game tied for 11th in yards per carry, and they also punched in the 11th-most scores on the ground.

Often playing from behind, the Bears probably lost out on better rushing numbers, but they have the tools via Tarik Cohen and Jordan Howard to be even better in that department in 2018.

It does all come back to Trubisky and the passing game. However, at least in theory, Trubisky has the talent, system, and supporting cast to take a huge Carson Wentz-like leap this season.

Factor in Chicago’s improving defense (9th in scoring, 7th against the pass, and 11th against the run), and it’s pretty arguable the Bears are one of the top Super Bowl 53 sleepers to keep an eye on.

I do think the 49ers and Texans are safer bets if you’re looking for that huge turn-around, but the Bears certainly can’t be ignored.

Summary

If you want even more Super Bowl 53 sleepers, consider the New York Giants (+2800), Kansas City Chiefs (+3300), and Washington Redskins (+7500).

New York was atrocious last year but still has the framework of a strong defense. They get a healthy Odell Beckham Jr. back and added a potential rookie sensation in running back Saquon Barkley.

KC has the same team that won the AFC West, with their big change being placing second-year passer Patrick Mahomes under center. How fast he develops could decide whether they’re a legit title threat or not.

The Redskins shouldn’t be completely ignored, either. They traded for former Chiefs passer Alex Smith and may have one of the more balanced rosters in the entire league.

Adding stud rusher Derrius Guice could improve an awful running game, while Washington may have the talent on defense to take over the NFC East.

Overall, all of these teams have at least a mild argument to be considered when you start thinking about what you want to do with 2018 Super Bowl betting.

That doesn’t have to mean these are the teams you go hard at (the Pats are probably still winning it all), but a few flier bets are worth doing each year.

Based on the way the league has been working for several years now, 1-2 wagers on would-be “bad teams” isn’t such a terrible idea.

The post Four Unlikely Contenders for Super Bowl 53 appeared first on GamblingSites.com.

Share:

The Rio offers esports experience with new Wall Gaming Lounge

Las Vegas Sun Stories: Gaming
The Rio offers esports experience with new Wall Gaming Lounge
Marking Caesars Entertainment’s first foray into a permanent esports venue, the Wall Gaming Lounge at the Rio offers players an immersive gaming experience ...
Share:

Casino City's Friday Five: Atlantic City grand opening edition

Casino City Times
Casino City's Friday Five: Atlantic City grand opening edition
There were new slot games that came out and jackpot winners left and right, but no story was bigger than two Atlantic City casinos celebrating their grand opening on Thursday.
Share:

MGM, Wynn tamp down Boston casino intrigue

Las Vegas Sun Stories: Gaming
MGM, Wynn tamp down Boston casino intrigue
Executives for MGM and Wynn are tamping down speculation the companies are quietly in talks over Wynn's Boston-area casino. MGM Resorts International CEO Jim Murren said today it would have to be an "extremely unique situation" for officials to ...
Share:

Nevada gaming revenue again tops $1 billion

Las Vegas Sun Stories: Gaming
Nevada gaming revenue again tops $1 billion
Nevada gaming revenue increased 5.29 percent to $1.04 billion in May compared to the same month last year, the fourth time in the last five months revenue has topped the ...
Share:

Atlantic City welcomes 2 shuttered casinos back to life

Las Vegas Sun Stories: Gaming
Atlantic City welcomes 2 shuttered casinos back to life
The reopenings have generated cautious optimism that better days are ahead for the seaside gambling resort that once was the only place in America outside Nevada with casinos ...
Share:

MGM, Wynn tamp down Boston casino intrigue

Las Vegas Sun Stories: Gaming
MGM, Wynn tamp down Boston casino intrigue
Executives for MGM and Wynn are tamping down speculation the companies are quietly in talks over Wynn's Boston-area casino. MGM Resorts International CEO Jim Murren said today it would have to be an "extremely unique situation" for officials to ...
Share:

Previewing the 2018 Wimbledon Championships – Picking the Likely Winners

GamblingSites.com
Previewing the 2018 Wimbledon Championships – Picking the Likely Winners

The most popular tennis tournament in the world, Wimbledon, is starting soon. The legendary English grass courts are where legends of the sport can be born. This year’s edition looks close, and it’s hard to predict who will win.

In the men’s tournament, the favorite is Roger Federer. Can the Swiss maestro actually get another Grand Slam at the age of 36?

There are plenty of candidates to dethrone him, but no one looks to be in particularly good shape.

As for the women, the situation is even closer there. Ever since Serena Williams gave birth, all Grand Slams are wide open, and the 2018 Wimbledon is no exception.

The question is, are there some solid betting opportunities in this situation? Let’s take a look.

Contenders for the Men’s Championship

The situation in male tennis right now is a weird one. Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal have won the last couple of Grand Slams and are looking far better than the competition, despite their age.

At the same time, a generation of players that was supposed to take over after those two, Djokovic, and Murray looks lost and incapable of consistently producing top tennis.

The likes of Dimitrov, Goffin, Querrey, and a couple of others are in their prime and should be winning stuff. Instead, they struggle to impress against the old guns.

Finally, there’s a wave of exciting youngsters who are impressive but still can’t find enough consistency to actually win a Grand Slam and often fall short.

The big question for Wimbledon 2018 is if this will change. I’m not so sure, but let’s look at the main favorites and the prices for them to grab the title.

Roger Federer 2.75

Roger will be 37 in just over a month. Somehow, he is the current number 2 in the rankings and is still the favorite here. He won Wimbledon last year and the Australian Open at the start of this season. Grass is his best surface, and as in 2017, Roger’s plan was to miss the entire season on clay to prepare for Wimbledon.

He returned in Stuttgart and Halle, winning the first tournament and reaching the final of the second. The Swiss legend looks in good shape. The price for him to bring the trophy home is 2.75, which is certainly tempting for a man who’s done so 8 times in the past.

If Roger can recreate the performance from last year or even from Australia early in 2018, no one can beat him, in all likelihood.

Considering his age, the biggest question is if he’s fit enough.

A couple of tough games on the road to the later stages could prevent him from winning. And yet, Federer didn’t drop a set in 2017. Will his age effect that much only a year later? I think the price might be worth a shot.

Novak Djokovic 5.00

The former number 1 in the world, Novak Djokovic has struggled in the past 2 years or so. He had a solid tournament in Queens and certainly looks like he’s finding his rhythm.

However, there were signs of the Nole we knew before. And yet, he keeps struggling both physically and mentally. In fact, Djokovic himself said he is not a contender for this year’s Wimbledon.

While I think this an attempt to relieve the pressure, I don’t think the Serbian player is ready to win a Grand Slam again. He will have to improve further. In fact, I have the feeling we might never see Djokovic win a major again.

After all, he is past his prime, too, and the younger players will eventually raise their levels enough to beat the veterans.

I think the price of 5.00 doesn’t offer any value, so Djokovic is not the best bet out there.

Marin Cilic 7.00

Next in line is the man who beat Novak Djokovic in the Queens final. Marin Cilic has won Wimbledon before and is in fine form in 2018. He was also the finalist in last year’s edition and lost against Roger Federer.

The Croatian tower loves playing on grass and certainly has the potential to win the Wimbledon title. In fact, I think he is one of the better choices out there, priced at 7.00 or so.

He knows how to win here and has been one of the most consistent players on the tour in the past couple of years.

He has a couple of finals and semifinals in big tournaments. Sure, Cilic is usually just short of that final step, but he is in his best years and could take advantage if Federer is not at his best this time around.

Rafael Nadal 7.00

Rafael Nadal was once again devastating at the Roland Garros and will be looking for a chance to add another Wimbledon title to his collection. He is the current number 1 in the rankings, after Federer failed to win the tournament in Halle.

Grass is by far the weakest surface of Nadal, though, so I’m not sure why the price for him is just 7.00. Ever since 2011, the Spaniard’s best performance was to reach round 4. His style is simply not suited to the surface, and there are plenty of players capable of knocking Nadal out.

While I would never underestimate a man with such a big heart,
I don’t think Rafa is among the favorites at Wimbledon 2018.
Nick Kyrgios 18.00

There are a couple of players priced in the 15-25.00 range, but I decided to pick Kyrgios here. The Australian is one of the most talented and yet controversial characters in the circuit.

He has the ability but has yet to find the consistency to reach the last 4 of a Grand Slam tournament. But still, Kyrgios is only 23 and has all the time in the world to actually improve.

Grass is his favorite surface, and the Australian has a record of 10-4 at the Wimbledon, his best win rate in a Grand Slam tournament.

Kyrgios also had a solid preparation and was barely beaten by Cilic in the semifinals in Queens. Of course, he once again reminded the world how immature he could be.

If Kyrgios manages to get his act together, he could make a deep run in Wimbledon 2018. I don’t think he has a shot at winning, though.

The Rest of the Bunch

There are a few players like Alexander Zverev, Grigor Dimitrov, Andy Murray, Milos Raonic, and Del Potro that are considered somewhat competitive.

While I feel they could have a decent tournament, I see none of them as the potential winner for various reasons. This is why I won’t discuss their chances.

Final Pick

I’m inclined to pick Roger Federer, as he is still the best player on grass, and his focus of the last couple of months has been targeted at Wimbledon. Still, the price of 2.75 is just a little too low for my taste.

One or two longer matches could start impacting his condition, which could fail him in the later stages. This is why I will go for Marin Cilic at 7.00. He likes the surface, has done it before and has been in fine shape recently.

PICKMarin Cilic7.00
Contenders for the Women’s Championship

While the men’s Wimbledon looks close, the female draw is a complete lottery. Serena Williams is now out of her prime physically, which leaves the Grand Slams wide open. We’ve seen how tight the last couple of them were, and I expect more of the same in Wimbledon 2018.

Let’s take a look at the players that are most likely to be in the conversation here.

Petra Kvitova 5.00

The powerful Petra Kvitova is the favorite of the bookies for this year’s Wimbledon. The Czech player has won the title twice in the past, but the last time that happened was in 2014.

Kvitova has failed to surpass round 3 since, but this year is more promising. She managed to win the Birmingham classic and looks good on grass, which is her favorite surface.

The power of Kvitova’s left hand is what brought her two titles, but I feel she’ll need more than just power to go all the way at Wimbledon this year.

Serena Williams 6.00

Serena gave birth in 2017, which naturally slowed her career down. Her last Grand Slam title was the Australian Open last year.

She did make a return for the French Open, but she had some health issues that forced her to retire. The conditioning has been the main target of Serena ever since, and it looks like she’s ready for Wimbledon.

However, there is another problem related to the maternity leave. Williams has fallen in the rankings, and there’s a dispute right now if she will be seeded. The decision will be made by the Wimbledon officials on Tuesday.

The initial signs are that she will be seeded, as many people from the tennis community argue that women shouldn’t be punished in the rankings for getting pregnant.

If I’m correct in my assumption and Serena is seeded, I think the price of 6.00 is more than decent.

Garbine Muguruza 7.50

Garbine Muguruza is only 24 but is ranked 3rd by the WTA and has won 2 Grand Slam titles. One of them was Wimbledon last year, which is a testimony to her ability to play on grass.

Her style certainly suits the surface, and she is in decent shape. The problem with Muguruza is that her young age makes her prone to inconsistencies. When it comes to raw potential, she certainly is up there with the best.

A price of 7.50 for her to win Wimbledon does look good and is certainly a bet worth considering.

Angelique Kerber 11.00

The German Angelique Kerber is a former number 1 with plenty of experience. She was at the top of her game in 2016, winning the Australian Open and the US Open, as well as reaching Wimbledon’s final.

Kerber has struggled to replicate her form in 2017, but there are some encouraging signs this year. She reached the last 4 in Australia and the last 8 in France in the first two Majors of the season.

Her aggressive style and power make her a formidable opponent at Wimbledon, and many will struggle against Kerber.

Still, I don’t think she is in her top form yet, and winning the tournament would be a step too far, even if the price is 11.00.

Madison Keys 16.00

As in the men’s draw, there are plenty of players priced around the 15-20.00 mark. I decided to include Madison Keys in my analysis instead of the rest for a couple of reasons.

Despite her young age of 23, Keys is already an emerging star and one of the brightest prospects in the US tennis.

She has reached at least a quarterfinal on all Grand Slam surfaces, but grass appears the best suited to her natural abilities.

Keys has a powerful serve and a strong forehand that make her dangerous on grass. I think she has a genuine shot at making a deep run at Wimbledon. In fact, I could see her go all the way and win her maiden Grand Slam. The price of 16.00 is certainly worth a shot.

What About the Rest?

There are plenty of other players who are considered in the mix for Wimbledon. The likes of Sloane Stephens, Simona Halep, Karolina Pliskova, and a couple more have the potential to win the huge prize.

However, I don’t like the odds for any of them, so I excluded them from this post. Of course, you never know when the odds are that close, but I will still stick with the betting opportunities I like the most.

Final Picks

I expect Serena Williams to be seeded and fit for this tournament. This is why I simply can’t ignore the price of 6.00 for her to lift the trophy.

PICKSerena Williams6.00

I will combine that will a smaller bet on Madison Keys, as I feel she is gradually building towards a Grand Slam title, and this could be it. At a price of 16.00, it’s certainly worth trying.

PICKMadison Keys16.00
Summary

I’m really looking forward to Wimbledon this year as a tennis fan. The fact that it’s wide open for both the men’s and women’s championships should make for a great couple of weeks of sporting entertainment.

With my betting hat on, however, I’m less enthused. This tournament is a really tough one to predict, and I can’t say I’m supremely confident about any of my picks. With that being said, though, I do feel they represent value.

I’ll also be looking for some spots to get my money down in individual matches. If I find any particularly good opportunities, I’ll be sure to share them with you right here.

The post Previewing the 2018 Wimbledon Championships – Picking the Likely Winners appeared first on GamblingSites.com.

Share:

Ocean Resort Casino celebrates grand opening

Casino City Times
Ocean Resort Casino celebrates grand opening
The ceremonial ribbon cutting took place today to celebrate the official opening of the 1,399-room Ocean Resort Casino, located directly on the Atlantic City Boardwalk.
Share:

EveryMatrix introduces CasinoEngine

Casino City Times
EveryMatrix introduces CasinoEngine
CasinoEngine helps operators like Norsk Tipping, Tipico, 188BET, K8 UK, or Wunderino to run efficient casino operations, and provide premium casino in a safe, regulated, and responsible gaming environment.
Share:

Ocean Resort Casino announces entertainment options

Casino City Times
Ocean Resort Casino announces entertainment options
The Atlantic City casino will offer performances that include popular comedian and actor Wayne Brady, comedienne Wanda Sykes, the theatrical production RAIN: A Tribute to the Beatles and an exciting fight card from Top Rank Boxing.
Share:

Votes on Caesars' purchase of Hoosier Park, Indiana Grand this week

Las Vegas Sun Stories: Gaming
Votes on Caesars' purchase of Hoosier Park, Indiana Grand this week
Hoosier Park Racing and Casino is set to be rebranded as Harrah's Hoosier Park if a proposed sale is approved by two gambling ...
Share:

Soccer World Cup Group H: Round 3 Preview and Betting Picks

GamblingSites.com
Soccer World Cup Group H: Round 3 Preview and Betting Picks

The favorite of Group H, Colombia, crashed at the start of the soccer World Cup but showed a completely different face in the 2nd round.

The South American team still can qualify for the next stage with a win in the last match against Senegal.

The African team could’ve been there already, but they blew the lead twice against Japan. As a result, both teams now have 4 points and lead the group standings.

A draw would be enough for both to progress, but this is no easy task. Japan will face a Polish side who will be eager to register at least one win and save some grace.

I think both games in the third round of this group have the potential to become thrilling encounters. Of course, my main goal would be to find some good betting opportunities.

Before I proceed with that, let’s analyze what happened in round 2 first.

Round 2 Recap and Impressions

After losing the opener against Japan, Colombia needed a performance and a result against Poland. My expectations were that the South American team certainly could win.

The start was a bit tricky, with Poland having more of the ball. However, Colombia did withstand the pressure without allowing the opponent any clear chances, and they slowly gained control. This brought a couple of opportunities, and Colombia was leading 1-0 at half time.

The second 45 minutes showed how good this side actually is. The South American team controlled the game and countered Poland at will. This led to two more goals for a final score of 3-0.

There are a couple of conclusions that can be drawn here. James Rodriguez is certainly a man who makes the differences. He was named man of the match and pulled the strings from midfield.

The Bayern Munich midfielder was able to keep the ball well when needed and produce some stunning key passes when the opportunity was there. If he stays fit, the sky is the limit for Colombia.

Especially since James has the supporting cast to succeed. The likes of Cuadrado, Quintero, Falcao, and Barrios all played well.

On top of that, the defense looked completely different from the game against Japan. The likes of Sanchez and Mina were rock-solid and didn’t allow Lewandowski much space.

Colombia looked like a well-oiled machine and the team that reached the last 8 in the 2014 Brazil World Cup.

Still, the country must win its last game to reach the last 16 in Russia.

At the same time, Poland again struggled to impress. I’m not sure what’s wrong with this team. There are plenty of decent players all around the pitch, including one of the best strikers in the world in Robert Lewandowski.

Unfortunately for them, nothing seems to work. The midfield is completely unable to create any clear chances for the strikers. There’s no purpose or penetration, just mindless sideways passing most of the time.

Another big problem is the leaky defense. Poland has the personnel to protect the goal well but simply doesn’t execute. I expected more from the side, but it’s all over for them now.

Still, I think the players will be ashamed by the result in the first two games and will be motivated. They can do better in the last match against Japan.

It will be a tough task, as the Asians have impressed me a lot so far. The local association took a huge gamble by replacing the coach just 2 months before the World Cup. I expected a completely different result and mostly negative consequences.

Instead, Japan has 4 points and is on the brink of qualifying for the next stage. One could argue that the opener against Colombia was a bit lucky, since they played with a man advantage for almost the entire match.

The game against Senegal proved that Japan is simply a solid and dangerous soccer team. The opponent went ahead twice, but that didn’t break the Asians. They managed to equalize both times. In fact, I feel they were the better team overall and had more chances.

A bit of luck and a better finishing could’ve brought Japan all the points and a spot in the last 16. However, the country shouldn’t worry that much. If the team performs at the same level as against Poland, they should complete the job.

Finally, it’s time to talk about Senegal. The Africans once again showed a lot of speed and dominated the first half. However, they were the worse team on the pitch in the second and easily could’ve lost the match against Japan.

The main problem with this team is the lack of consistent performance throughout the whole 90 minutes. If they don’t improve that, an early exit is certainly on the cards.

So, let’s see what could be expected from the 3rd-round games of this Group H.

Japan – Poland

Let’s take a look at the most popular betting markets for this match.

Japan to Win2.62
Draw3.30
Poland to Win2.90
Under 2.5 Goals1.72
Over 2.5 Goals2.07

The bookies believe this game is pretty close, and I tend to agree. The Polish team has underperformed so far, but it does include some quality players. In a way, the pressure is off now, and many teams like Peru, Saudi Arabia, and Morocco benefited in such a situation to perform well in their last World Cup match.

I suspect something similar may happen with Poland. The side’s major problem in this competition has been the lack of clear chances for the strikers. If Lewandowski and Milik have some opportunities, they could be clinical.

The defense of Japan has been leaky so far, and the European team should be able to find some space. On top of that, the Polish squad is taller and stronger, so the set pieces could be a problem as well.

The Japanese back line may not be very consistent, but the attack is working well. The Asians scored twice in both of their games so far and had more chances to find the net. I was surprised by that, as I expected Japan to struggle in front of goal.

The side will now face a defense that has conceded 5 times so far in the tournament, which is another reason to believe Japan will be able to find the net.

Prediction and Betting Picks

Picking a winner is a bit challenging for this match. The draw would be good enough for Japan, so the team will be a bit cautious. At the same time, Poland has nothing to lose. Sides in such a situation usually play a free-flowing football.

Since I expect a lot of chances and some goals, I feel the over 2.5 goals market is the one that contains some solid value. To see 3 or more goals for 2.07 is good enough for me, so this will be my final pick.

PICKOver 2.5 Goals2.07
Senegal – Colombia

Here are the prices that most of you would like to know.

Senegal to Win4.60
Draw3.70
Colombia to Win1.85
Under 2.5 Goals1.80
Over 2.5 Goals2.00

Colombia had a bad start in this World Cup and lost 2-1 to Japan. However, James was injured, and the side went down to 10 men in the 3rd minute. This is why I expected more against Poland, and they delivered.

The 3-0 was a testimony to both the defensive resilience and the deadly attack of Colombia. The team stood firm in the periods when Poland had more of the ball and punished every mistake at the other end.

Senegal looks way more potent than the European side and could be a much bigger threat, though. The speedy and strong forwards could cause Colombia trouble, especially if the likes of Davinson Sanchez perform the way they did in the first game against Japan.

Still, the Colombian team has much better players in the middle of the park, and I expect them to control the tempo. On top of that, the Senegal defense is hardly perfect, so the likes of James, Cuadrado, and Falcao should have some opportunities.

It’s worth noting that whatever happens, one of the teams will be back against the wall in the second half. This opens up the opportunity for plenty of action.

Prediction and Betting Picks

I don’t have any doubts which team is better. Colombia certainly is the favorite here, as the side is more flexible and has the better players overall. On top of that, the South Americans will be chasing the victory, so the price of 1.85 seems solid.

This is my main pick, but there’s another I like. All games in this group were over 2.5 goals so far, and there’s a reason for that. The attacking side of each nation prevails, so the odds of 2.00 are also worth a shot.

PICKColombia to Win1.85
PICKOver 2.5 Goals2.00
BetVictor Million Pound Bet

Next in line is the BetVictor Million Pound Bet. I believe Colombia and Senegal will score some goals, so this is my selection.

Colombia to Win 3-1 James Rodriguez to Score 1+ Goals Both Teams Over 2.5 Cards Senegal Under 2.5 Corners Sadio Mane to Score 1+ Goals Colombia Over 7.5 Corners

I can easily see Colombia scoring 3 and James finding the net at least once. Also, I think it’s time for Sadio Mane to finish a fast attack in his typical fashion, as he has only one fluky goal so far.

Also, I expect some tough tackles, plenty of corners for Colombia, and not so many of them for the counter-attacking Senegal.

Final Words

I’m really confident that Colombia will have a role to play in this soccer World Cup, but that might not be the case. Also, I expect Poland to finally show some of the quality that this squad certainly has.

It’s hard to predict what will happen at the end, though, as this is one of the closest groups of the World Cup.

Good luck!

The post Soccer World Cup Group H: Round 3 Preview and Betting Picks appeared first on GamblingSites.com.

Share:

TS Casino relaunched with new look

Casino City Times
TS Casino relaunched with new look
Formerly known as Times Square Casino, the new ‘TS Casino' is promising customers a comprehensively enhanced experience and more reasons to play than ever before.
Share:

Soccer World Cup Group F: Round 3 Preview and Betting Picks

GamblingSites.com
Soccer World Cup Group F: Round 3 Preview and Betting Picks

The Germans have the reputation of being the most dangerous with their backs against the wall. This was proven once again in the soccer World Cup.

The reigning champions found themselves with a man down against Sweden and still found a winner at the death.

This leaves Germany’s destiny in their own hands for the 3rd and final round of Group F. At the same time, Sweden will probably have to win against a strong Mexican side in order to progress.

Even South Korea has a chance to go through, despite losing both of the first two games, while Mexico could go out after winning twice. Simply put, everything is possible in Group F, which makes the last round extremely exciting.

Before we take a closer look at the final two fixtures, let’s recap round 2.

Round 2 Recap and Impressions

Mexico managed to confirm the good impressions from the match against Germany by beating South Korea as well. The side looked dominant from the start. The Mexicans had more chances and managed to score twice through Carlos Vela and Javier Hernandez.

For most of the game, the team also defended well, and only a late goal from Son Heung-min spoiled the party a bit, but I don’t think Mexico will suffer too much because of that.

In fact, this is one of the most impressive sides after the first two games. The side has an exceptional balance between attacking and defending. Both are done by the entire team, and everyone works hard all across the pitch.

When it comes to the creative part of the game, the Mexicans combine flair and pace. They are deadly if they have the space but could also patiently find their moment to strike.

This is why they managed to win deservedly against completely different opponents like Germany and South Korea.

A lot of people seem to like the Mexicans a lot, and even the legendary Diego Maradona admitted he is a fan.

Still, the team needs to stay focused and complete the job, because the spot in the last 16 is not guaranteed right now.

A loss against Sweden could be the end of the road for the Mexicans.

It’s funny how Mexico has 6 points and is not through, while South Korea has 0 and still has a chance. The Asian team followed a dull performance against Sweden with another similar game. They now face the task of beating Germany to give themselves a chance to progress to the next round.

South Korea will somehow find a way to create more chances and keep it tighter at the back. I’m not sure they’ll manage that.

The good news for the Asians is that Germany was unconvincing in both of its games so far. Sure, the country did beat Sweden 2-1, but it wasn’t easy.

The Scandinavians went ahead early on and had chances to score a second multiple times. Germany was dominating most of the game, but the clear-cut opportunities weren’t that many.

On top of that, Jerome Boateng was sent off in the second half, which capped a terrible overall display by the defender. The general impression is that the German back line isn’t working for some reason, and it’s hard to see why.

In the first match, the lack of cover from Khedira seemed to be the problem, but he was benched, and there wasn’t much difference. There were other chances, too, with Mesut Ozil and Mats Hummels sitting on the bench too.

That didn’t improve the team that much, and it’s curious if Joachim Low will actually find a starting lineup that’s working well.

If he doesn’t, Germany could actually go down in the group stage for the first time in ages.

Still, a late Toni Kroos strike means the reigning champions have to beat South Korea and will certainly progress. This should be doable, and even a draw could work if Mexico wins against Sweden.

The Scandinavian team should’ve been in a much better spot, but the otherwise brilliant in this game Robin Olsen conceded a goal from a tight angle.

The Swedes had some good chances of their own to go ahead before that, but they lacked clinical finishing. They now have to most probably beat the strong Mexican team to secure a spot in the last 16.

Mexico – Sweden

Let’s start with the main betting markets available for this match.

Mexico to Win2.45
Draw3.30
Sweden to Win3.20
Under 2.5 Goals1.66
Over 2.5 Goals2.15

Mexico probably feels unlucky, as all other teams with 6 points from the first two rounds are already in the last 16. The team will still have to push hard against Sweden, because a loss here and a win for Germany in the other game will mean Mexico will go home.

Still, the country is not in a bad position. A draw would guarantee that Mexico wins the group. Based on the first two rounds, the team has all that it takes to take something from the match.

The attacking players are always dangerous and combine pace with exceptional ball movement. As a result, Mexico managed to score twice in each of the opening two games and create more chances.

I expect more of the same against a Swedish defense that’s decent but will have problems against the speedy Mexicans.

At the same time, the Scandinavians are more than capable of finding the net themselves. After Zlatan Ibrahimovic retired, the team has been doing a good job of spreading the responsibility in attack.

As a result, the danger comes from various players, and we’ve seen that against both South Korea and Germany. This gives Sweden hope that they could win and book a place in the last 16.

Prediction and Betting Picks

The pressure on both teams will be huge here, so I expect a rather cagey start of the game. As time goes by, Sweden will have to push harder and look for a goal.

Mexico certainly has the advantage here, and I think they won’t lose this match. However, I don’t find odds that feel solid in this direction. Instead, I will go for a dull first half with no goals. The price for that is 2.62, and it feels too good to miss.

PICK0-0 at Half Time2.62
South Korea – Germany

Here are the main odds for this match.

South Korea to Win17.00
Draw7.50
Germany to Win1.20
Under 2.5 Goals2.60
Over 2.5 Goals1.47

Something doesn’t feel right in the defense of this German team. The reigning champions are letting their opponents create too many chances. Mexico exposed the lack of pace, but it wasn’t much better against Sweden.

Despite dominating most of the game, the Germans conceded one goal and could’ve easily seen the Scandinavians score more, if it wasn’t for Manuel Neuer and the inability of Sweden to score.

On the bright side, Germany looked strong in attack in their second game and created plenty of chances.

The Germans’ chances weren’t that clear-cut, but the champions managed to put Sweden under pressure for most of the game, even after going down to 10 men.

If you add the famous German spirit, it’s no surprise they won at the end. Next in line is South Korea, and the Germans need another win to progress.

They should control the match, have most of the ball, and create enough chances to take all the points and book a place in the last 16.

There are two possible obstacles here. The first one is related to the fact that South Korea will certainly defend in numbers. Germany will have to find a way past through it. I think the team will have enough to create some chances and score, though.

The bigger potential issue is the leaky defense. South Korea might not have the potential of Sweden or Mexico, but there are some quick players that could exploit the lack of pace and cover.

I wouldn’t completely rule the Koreans out, as if they somehow manage to score first, it’s certainly game on.

Prediction and Betting Picks

Germany is the obvious favorite in this match, but the odds of 1.20 are simply ridiculous. This is why I will have to pass and look for other options.

One of them will raise a few eyebrows, but 17.00 for South Korea to snatch the victory is way too high. I assume most of the public money is going on Germany, and that’s the reason for this price. I would certainly place a small wager, because there’s a lot of value involved.

As for my main bet, I will once again pick a half-time option. Under 1.5 goals in the first 45 minutes is priced at 1.66, and I think this is the best market available. I don’t expect either team to push hard and take too many risks.

PICKUnder 1.5 Goals1.66
BetVictor Million Pound Bet

The game I picked for the BetVictor Million Pound Bet is between South Korea and Germany. Here’s what I’ve gone for.

South Korea to Win Both Teams to Score (Yes) Germany Over 12.5 Corners Both Teams Over 2.5 Cards

Obviously, I feel that the price for South Korea is way too high. They could snatch a 2-1 win at the end, and I can see Germany win a ton of corners.

Also, the game could get ugly at some point, hence the cards. The overall price is over 4,500.

Final Words

I think the Germans will manage to qualify at the end, and Mexico will win this Group F of the soccer World Cup. Still, you never know, and the last two reigning world champions were knocked out in the group stages.

Do you think the Germans could share the same faith? Let me know in the comment section below.

Good luck!

The post Soccer World Cup Group F: Round 3 Preview and Betting Picks appeared first on GamblingSites.com.

Share:

MGM, Wynn tamp down Boston casino intrigue

Las Vegas Sun Stories: Gaming
MGM, Wynn tamp down Boston casino intrigue
Executives for MGM and Wynn are tamping down speculation the companies are quietly in talks over Wynn's Boston-area casino. MGM Resorts International CEO Jim Murren said today it would have to be an "extremely unique situation" for officials to ...
Share:

Indian Gaming revenues increase

Casino City Times
Indian Gaming revenues increase
National Indian Gaming Commission released the Fiscal Year 2017 Gross Gaming Revenue amount, which saw an increase of 3.9% over 2016, totaling $32.4 billion.
Share:

Can sports betting do for Atlantic City what Trump couldn't?

Las Vegas Sun Stories: Gaming
Can sports betting do for Atlantic City what Trump couldn't?
The last time there was so much hype about the future of this troubled seaside resort, Donald Trump was doing most of the hyping. The president, then a casino impresario, opened the Trump Taj Mahal with great fanfare in 1990 ...
Share:

Previewing Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest 2018 – Odds and My Picks

GamblingSites.com
Previewing Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest 2018 – Odds and My Picks

Some of the best competitive eaters will look to stuff their faces in the name of personal glory next month.

The Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest returns on July 4th, where legendary self-gorger Joey Chestnut will look to secure his third straight title.

Chestnut would have an even more epic string of wins had it not been for a random win by Matt Stonie in 2015, while Chestnut will vie for his 11th overall Hot Dog Eating championship this summer.

Odds Disclaimer 1
Will Joey Chestnut Win Again?

The race to the top of the hot dog mountain begins on July 4th at Coney Island, and despite being another year older, Chestnut is the star competitive eater Vegas (and just about everyone else) is backing.

The question is if there is someone worthy of threatening his face-stuffing throne, or of the infallible Chestnut will be victorious yet again.

BetOnline certainly thinks so, as Chestnut leads the way with overwhelming -450 odds to be the winner.

Joey Chestnut-450
Carmen Cincotti+450
Matt Stonie+700
The Field/Any+700

Last year, we looked at Joey Chestnut’s odds of winning the Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest and picked him to win.

He did, and bettors had to pay a fat price (-650 at most novelty betting sites) to back him.

While betting on Joey Chestnut doesn’t bring back much value, you’re at least getting a bit of a discount compared to where we were a year ago.

That may force some hands to consider alternative options. Obviously Chestnut is a steep price for those looking to bring back some serious coin, while there actually are viable contenders.

Stonie literally stole the show three years ago and has finished third or better in each of the last Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating competitions.

There’s also Cincotti, who ate 60 hot dogs and was good for second place in 2017.

If you think either of those guys can rise up and truly challenge arguably the greatest competitive eater to ever live, then the price is certainly tempting.

Of the two, Stonie stands out as the better play, as he’s a way better price, and he actually won one of these things recently.

It’s very likely this year’s winner comes out of that trio, but a flier bet on a fourth candidate emerging and stealing the show isn’t out of the question.

That’s a decent try at +700, and someone like Geoffrey Esper (4th in 2017) could be worth monitoring.

While I certainly suggest a flier bet on someone you like to challenge Chestnut, he’s where most of the betting money should be going.

PICKJoey Chestnut-450
Hot Dog Count

Whether you buy Joey Chestnut to win again, you can also profit off of the number of hot dogs he can stomach.

He broke his own record with 72 last year, and knowing his drive and eating talent, I wouldn’t put it past him to challenge it again.

BetOnline starts the over/under for his hotdog intake at 68.5.

Over 68.5-175
Under 68.5+135

There isn’t a ton of value in it, but the Over makes the most sense.

Chestnut has managed to scarf down 69 or more hot dogs three different times in his career (hitting on 68 exactly twice), while he’s downed 70 and 72 in each of the last two events.

Judging on his recent form and how he’ll be shooting for another record, I like the Over here.

PICKOver 68.5-175
Can Miki Sudo Add to Her Streak?

Miki Sudo was the easy favorite on the women’s side of things last year. She entered as a big -400 favorite after winning three years in a row, successfully supplanting former phenom Sonya Thomas.

Sudo made it four in a row with another big win in 2017, as she consumed 41 hot dogs and crushed the competition in the process.

She does have some solid competition, though, as former champion Sonya Thomas has won this event three times and even holds the women’s record (45) for hot dogs eaten.

Here are the odds for the women’s competition.

Miki Sudo-450
Anyone Else+325

That’s basically pitting Sudo against Thomas, and if I can get a former champion at a price of +325, I have to consider it.

This is slightly different than Chestnut versus Stonie, too, seeing as Thomas has downed more hot dogs than any woman ever, and she knows what it takes to win this thing multiple times.

In fact, Thomas was close to winning a fourth title back in 2016, when she finished just three hot dogs behind Sudo.

There’s a solid chance Sudo holds down the fort and wins again, but she’s really got one big threat, and at +325, I’m willing to put my neck out for some elite value.

Besides, it doesn’t have to be Thomas to upset Sudo. Any other female can win here, and your +325 bet converts.

PICKAnyone Else+325
Sudo’s Hot Dog Count

Whether you believe Sudo wins or not, you can add on a wager for how many hot dogs she ends up eating. Last year, she ate 41 hot dogs, which represented a career high.

Perhaps she vies for the record, or she just looks to stay one step ahead of her competition.

Here’s the over/under.

Over 40.5 Hot Dogs-120
Under 40.5 Hot Dogs-120

I like the value in betting against Miki Sudo this year, so I’m certainly liking that this is a leveled playing field for this wager.

Seeing as Sudo has topped this Over just once in her four wins, I think there’s a pretty good chance she struggles to get 41+ again.

PICKUnder 40.5 Hot Dogs-120
Summary

In the end, this is probably going to be another event where Joey Chestnut dominates and maybe even sets a new hot dog eating record.

Miki Sudo is just as much of a star here, too, at least when you consider she could be vying for her fifth straight title.

Overall, it’s set up to be a very exciting event.

The main favorites don’t offer much incentive for casual bettors, but the thrill of an upset or two (as well as two other props) makes this a very interesting contest to keep tabs on.

My vote is for Chestnut to prevail yet again and Sudo to be upset, but the big win is for everyone who gets to take in this fun event.

Enjoy a hot dog (or 70), and have fun watching (and betting on) this year’s hot dog eating contest!

YOU CAN BET ON NATHAN’S HOT DOG EATING CONTEST AT BETONLINE

The post Previewing Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest 2018 – Odds and My Picks appeared first on GamblingSites.com.

Share:

Xavier Mortimer's Magical Dream to celebrate Fourth of July

Casino City Times
Xavier Mortimer's Magical Dream to celebrate Fourth of July
Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino's Sin City Theatre will celebrate the land of the free with an enchanting VIP experience for Independence Day at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, 4 July.
Share:

Boil water order remains in Laughlin as water tests continue

Las Vegas Sun Stories: Gaming
Boil water order remains in Laughlin as water tests continue
Initial tests show samples of drinking water in Laughlin are meeting water-quality standards but officials want to conduct more tests before lifting an boil-water advisory that's been in place since ...
Share:

Soyza wins $1,600 MSPT Venetian

Casino City Times
Soyza wins $1,600 MSPT Venetian
After three days of play, it was Malaysia's Michael Soyza who came out on top to win $588,249, the biggest first-place prize in MSPT history.
Share:

Terminally ill man gets last wish to gamble in Atlantic City

Las Vegas Sun Stories: Gaming
Terminally ill man gets last wish to gamble in Atlantic City
A terminally ill New Jersey man says he got one of his last wishes fulfilled this week: to drink a cold beer and play a few more hands of blackjack at his favorite casino in Atlantic City. John Mudry and his family visited Bally's Atlantic City on Tuesday to fulfill one ...
Share:

Soccer World Cup Group B: Round 3 Preview and Betting Picks

GamblingSites.com
Soccer World Cup Group B: Round 3 Preview and Betting Picks

Everybody expected Spain and Portugal to dominate Group B of the soccer World Cup. It certainly looks like that, if you check the results and the standings.

In reality, both European teams struggled in the second round, and only the lack of cutting edge shown by Iran and Morocco prevented them from scoring.

Funnily enough, the African team was great at times during this tournament but is the only one that doesn’t have a chance to progress to the knockout stage. A stupid own-goal in the match against Iran was the key moment, in my opinion.

Still, Morocco has the chance to save some grace against Spain, and I expect some tough battle there. At the same time, Iran will try to beat Portugal and reach the last 16.

I don’t believe this is possible, but who knows?

Round 2 Recap and Impressions

No disrespect to the teams in this Group B, but the 2nd-round games were dreadful to watch. For a start, Portugal faced Morocco and won 1-0. It was job done at the end, but I would hardly be satisfied if I was a supporter of the European team.

It all started brightly with an early goal by Cristiano Ronaldo, who was happy to become the most prolific international scorer in Europe. He also recorded the highest top speed at the World Cup, despite being aged 33.

I would say this was pretty much the only positive thing for Ronaldo and Portugal in this game.

After opening the scoring, Portugal mostly defended. Morocco pushed hard, especially in the second half, and only the lack of clinical finishers in the side prevented them from scoring.

I honestly thought Portugal had a better defense than that. Many people say they did protect the goal well, but I don’t buy that. Morocco could’ve easily scored a couple and had chances till the very end of the match.

No matter how inept your opponent is at finishing, you can’t let him have that many chances. A better team would’ve certainly beaten Portugal.

At the same time, the counter-attacking soccer of the Europeans was nowhere to be seen. They barely had any chances after scoring early on, which was even more shocking.

I’m not sure what to make of this, as it is early on, and the explanation could be simple. Portugal probably wanted to do the job and still save some energy. The other option is that they aren’t that good. I would say the truth is somewhere in the middle, and they will eventually get exposed by a solid team in the knockouts.

As for Morocco, they were one of the teams I enjoyed in this tournament. They played intelligent soccer and had their moments.

Unfortunately, you can’t expect to win games when you can’t score goals.

The Moroccans had their chances and dominated both of their first two fixtures, but they didn’t make it count. As a result, they will be going home after the group stage.

In the other game, I expected a very talented Spanish side to trash Iran without much trouble. Boy, I was wrong. The Europeans did dominate most of the game in terms of possession, while their opponent was content to mostly sit back and defend.

Nothing unexpected here. What surprised me was the total lack of any chances for the Spanish team. In fact, it took an extremely lucky deflection for Diego Costa to open the scoring in the second half.

Usually, this is where the defensive discipline of teams like Iran is done, but that wasn’t the case. The side kept defending fiercely and didn’t allow Spain many chances.

On top of that, Iran found a way to create a couple of opportunities but failed to capitalize. Credit to the team that played as equal against a side that’s much stronger on paper.

At the end of the day, the lack of quality players in Iran and Morocco made the difference. However, the former still could complete a miracle with a win against Portugal.

With that said, let’s take a closer look at round 3.

Iran – Portugal

Here’s what the bookies offer when it comes to this game.

Iran to Win5.75
Draw3.70
Portugal to Win1.72
Under 2.5 Goals1.53
Over 2.5 Goals2.40

Come round 3 of this Group B, I expected Morocco to be the team who would still have the chance to upset the odds. Instead, Iran could make history if they somehow find a way to beat Portugal. Judging by what we saw so far in this group, this won’t be such a shock.

Style-wise, both teams are very similar. Both of them prefer to predominantly defend and try to snatch a goal from a set piece or a counter-attack. The major difference, of course, is in the quality of the players.

Portugal has some experienced professionals from the top European leagues, including one of the best goalscorers in the history of soccer. Cristiano Ronaldo found the net 4 times already at this World Cup, and the Golden Boot is his to lose.

Yet he is the only player from Portugal performing like a world-class star. The other members of the squad, bar the goalkeeper Rui Patricio, have been rather average.

At the same time, the memory of Euro 2016 is fresh in my mind. Portugal had all sorts of problems early on, Ronaldo wasn’t fully fit, but the country lifted the trophy at the end.

Simply put, their style is based on efficiency, and it has been working in the World Cup as well. This is why I can’t see a surprise here.

Iran will be focused on keeping a clean sheet, and they might actually achieve it. After all, they conceded only once so far, and it was a freakish accident.

The question is how Iran is going to score, since their only goal so far was a freakish accident as well.

Overall, I expect a tight and tactical game that will probably be almost unwatchable.

Prediction and Betting Picks

I’m not ENTIRELY sure what to expect from Portugal, to be honest. They should go out, play attacking soccer, and take the lead. This will eliminate any risks of conceding a stupid goal that could throw them out of the World Cup.

At the same time, they have tried to get the best out of each game with the least effort. They could possibly play with fire once more and focus on keeping a clean sheet.

Still, Iran will be forced to actually push at some point, which should leave some space for Portugal to exploit. This is the reason I like the price of 1.72 for the European side, and this is my final pick. I’ll go with 1-0 as the scoreline.

PICKPortugal to Win1.72
Spain – Morocco

Let’s start with the main betting odds for this match.

Spain to Win1.36
Draw5.00
Morocco to Win11.00
Under 2.5 Goals1.85
Over 2.5 Goals1.95

I already mentioned this, but Morocco was certainly a team I enjoyed. They must be heartbroken by that 1-0 loss against Iran in the 1st round.

The hopes of the Africans to play in the last 16 are obviously gone, but I still think they will play for their honor against the Spanish side.

The problem is that they are probably the most convenient team in this group for Spain, style-wise. Both Portugal and Iran defended in numbers, which brought some problems.

Of course, I expect Morocco to prioritize defending too, but not as deep as the other two sides in the group. They will try to keep the ball and attack themselves, which could leave some space for the talented Spanish players.

The question is, how does Spain proceed here?

Do they rest some players and give chances to other members of the squad? I’m not sure.

I think the country will fancy its chances both against Russia and Uruguay in the last 16, so first or second doesn’t matter much.

However, giving some minutes to players that might play key roles later on in the tournament may pay off big time.

This is why I expect a mixed team for Spain, containing some of the players who started the first two matches, as well as some new faces.

Prediction and Betting Picks

Morocco will be eager to at least get a point in this World Cup. However, they can’t score for their life so far, and I can’t see a magic fix to this problem.

At the same time, Spain will have some space up front and has the means to take advantage. The price of 1.36 for the Europeans to win is way too low. However, Spain to win to nil is priced at 1.95, and I like this one for sure. Something like 1-0 or 2-0 sounds like a reasonable full-time result.

PICKSpain to Win to Nil1.95
BetVictor Million Pound Bet

Unfortunately, the PriceItUp for round 3 of Group A is not available at the time this post is being written. Still, I will provide my pick for the BetVictor Million Pound Bet.

I’m not 100% sure what the odds would be, but I expect a high price.

Iran to Win 1:0 Over 4.5 Cards Under 6.5 Corners Cristiano Ronaldo to Be Booked Pepe to Be Booked Portugal Under 2.5 Corners

Portugal has been playing with fire ever since EURO 2016, and eventually, they will get burned. I think it’s worth trying it here.

Also, I expect them to get extremely frustrated if Iran takes the lead, hence the card predictions.

Final Words

Spain and Portugal seem on course to qualify for the last 16. Still, both Morocco and Iran have been brave so far in the tournament.

Can they actually surprise the favorites in this Group B of the soccer World Cup? I’m not sure that’s the case and would love to hear your opinion.

Good luck!

The post Soccer World Cup Group B: Round 3 Preview and Betting Picks appeared first on GamblingSites.com.

Share:

MGM, Wynn tamp down Boston casino intrigue

Las Vegas Sun Stories: Gaming
MGM, Wynn tamp down Boston casino intrigue
Executives for MGM and Wynn are tamping down speculation the companies are quietly in talks over Wynn's Boston-area casino. MGM Resorts International CEO Jim Murren said today it would have to be an "extremely unique situation" for officials to ...
Share:

How Is the Introduction of Video Assistant Referees Influencing the World Cup?

GamblingSites.com
How Is the Introduction of Video Assistant Referees Influencing the World Cup?

For years, the governing bodies in the soccer world refused to implement video technologies in the game. A lot of players, specialists, and fans have been requesting a change because the game is getting faster all the time.

As a result, the referees are struggling to keep up, and there are many mistakes. In fact, it’s almost impossible to find an important soccer tournament from the past that lacked controversy.

In almost every Champions League, World Cup, or any other competition, there are always games decided by a mistake of the referees.

One could argue that the influence of the officials is way too big, and this has to change.

It was inevitable that the likes of UEFA and FIFA would react. In the past couple of years, we’ve seen video technology slowly introduced in many tournaments all across the globe.

However, the biggest breakthrough is the decision to introduce the video assistant referees, or simply VAR, to the 2018 World Cup. This has brought a lot of controversy, so let’s take a look at the influence of VAR so far.

Video Assistant Referees in a Nutshell

Let’s start by explaining how the whole system works. For a start, there are a couple of referees in a room with a couple of monitors. They have access to all the angles provided by the cameras at the stadium. The guys there are called video assistant referees, hence the abbreviation VAR.

The referees on the pitch have a direct contact with them and have the right to request a video review in certain situations. Also, the VAR team has the right to recommend a review to be conducted.

Here are the situations when this could happen.

Goals

If there are some doubts if a goal should stand, like probable fouls or offsides, VAR could be used

Penalties

The idea is to overrule wrongly-given penalties and for clear ones not to be missed

Red Cards

Similar to the penalties, the purpose is to not miss red-card incidents

Mistaken Identity

If the main referee makes a mistake like showing a yellow card to the wrong player, VAR is used to correct that.

If you want to know a bit more about the rules, you could check FIFA’s explanation.

The Good Stuff

As I already mentioned, there were games when certain players and teams were unhappy with the way VAR works, but I will start with the positives from the system.

Invaluable Help to the Referees

For a start, it gives the referees the chance to do the right thing in cases when they didn’t see something. For example, if they didn’t have direct contact with a certain situation, but they understood there was some kind of incident.

In the past, they were instructed not to give fouls and penalties they didn’t see. As they can’t possibly see everything, this lead to various issues.

With the introduction of VAR, this is not the case in this World Cup.

We’ve seen multiple cases already where the referees sensed that something had happened and requested some assistance. The replays give the VAR team everything required to dig deep and make an informed decision.

I believe this does make the life of the referees easier and will certainly help in the future. In fact, this probably is one of the main reasons the current World Cup is easily on course of smashing all records for the most penalties in the history of the soccer competition.

Offsides

I think one of the biggest bonuses that VAR brings is that the linesmen are no longer under such immense pressure when it comes to the offside situations.

The FIFA referees committee chairman and former top official Pierluigi Collina explained before the World Cup that each linesman is instructed to keep his flag down in tight situations and let the play continue.

In the meantime, the video assistants check if the player was indeed offside. The logic behind such an approach is simple. You can rule out a goal if there was an offside that wasn’t given. However, you can’t bring the situation back if the flag was up and there was no offside.

I like this approach, and we’ve already seen it in action during the World Cup. It’s certainly one of the areas where VAR is useful.

Not Too Many Interruptions

One of the main arguments against the introduction of video technologies was that they would interrupt the game too often. I think it was somewhat valid, but the current solution proves that it is possible to use help and still avoid that.

My overall feeling is that the VAR is not an issue, and the flow of the game stays intact.

The Bad Stuff

Obviously, there are problems with the current VAR system, and they are obvious to see. Let’s take a look at them.

The Teams Have No Say

One of the major downsides is that the video technologies are basically only there to help the referees. While I can understand the logic behind that, it’s still an issue.

After all, one of the main points of introducing the technologies is to reduce the power of the officials. If the teams can’t request a VAR review, there’s a huge chance plenty of situations will be missed.

The best example since the start of the World Cup is the game between England and Tunisia. As Marcus Rashford rightfully said, there were at least two clear penalties against Harry Kane, and they were not given.

I believe the teams must have the chance to appeal and request a review of major incidents. Of course, this should be limited somehow.

The soccer authorities should check out how other sports do it.

For example, the experience in tennis could work. Give each team a couple of reviews per game, and that’s that.

The VAR Teams Are Not Proactive Enough

Despite the official FIFA rules that give the VAR team the right to inform the referee a review should be conducted, the impression is that simply doesn’t happen. All the cases so far have been initiated by the main official.

This leaves room for error if he completely misses an incident. The two penalty appeals in the England game are a good example.

All the people watching the match saw the replay, and it was clear that Kane was tackled. How on Earth did the VAR team miss them?

Let’s hope this changes in the future, as it proves to be a problem in the current World Cup.

New Betting Markets

One of the interesting consequences of VAR is the introduction of some new betting markets by the bookies. For example, you could now place a bet on if VAR will be used in a certain match.

On top of that, some sportsbooks have the option for you to place a wager (on individual games) that a goal will be overruled after the use of VAR.

This one is particularly interesting, especially if you consider the offside instructions I already mentioned. We’ve only seen one such incident during the World Cup so far, but I expect that it will occur again.

Considering the high odds you could find, this might be an interesting opportunity to include in your pre-match wagers.

Conclusion

If we consider all the good and the bad sides of VAR, it seems like the new system is showing some promise. It does solve a couple of issues and has the potential to improve in the future.

Let’s hope the soccer authorities will use the experience from this World Cup to make the system even better.

It’s a real shame to see the number of referee mistakes that decide matches and even tournaments in the most popular game around the globe. If VAR proves to be the solution to that, it will be a VERY good thing for the sport.

The post How Is the Introduction of Video Assistant Referees Influencing the World Cup? appeared first on GamblingSites.com.

Share:

Talking Points from the 2018 NBA Draft – What Happened and What It All Means

GamblingSites.com
Talking Points from the 2018 NBA Draft – What Happened and What It All Means

The NBA Draft always throws up plenty of discussion points. Last night, the 2018 edition didn’t disappoint.  There were some great moments, lots of suspense, a few surprises, and a whole heap of stuff to talk about.

Now that the draft is over, it’s time to draw a breath and try to figure out what just happened. Who were the big winners? Who were the big losers? How did the draft affect the expectations for the upcoming season?

We have the whole summer to try to answer these questions, and many more besides. But why wait? We’ve all been talking about the draft in the office here, so I got a few members of the team together for a more formal look at what we witnessed last night.

And so I present to you the official GamblingSites.com take on the 2018 NBA Draft.

Which Team Had the Best Overall Draft?

Jerry Summer: There are a couple of franchises that will be very happy after last night, and it’s hard to select one that had the best overall draft.

Still, I would probably go for the Atlanta Hawks. Acquiring Luka Doncic and trading him for Trae Young plus a 2019 first-round pick was a masterclass.

According to the rumors, this is the guy they wanted in the first place, and that draft pick just adds a lot of extra value, especially since it’s only 1-5 protected.

And of course, Trae Young is the best passer and shooter in the 2018, in my opinion.

Noah Davis: Several teams had strong drafts, including the Hawks. Jerry isn’t wrong here, but one could argue that letting go of a possible generational talent like Luka Doncic was a massive mistake.

Doncic has been compared to James Harden, after all, while some have likened Trae Young to (gulp) Jimmer Fredette.

Luka Doncic
Will the Hawks regret trading Luka Doncic?

That being said, the Suns truly crushed this draft. They probably chose right with a pure brute in DeAndre Ayton at the top spot, especially considering they haven’t had a true answer at center in years.

Phoenix didn’t stop there, though, as they swung a trade to land a second lottery talent in Mikal Bridges. They even picked up France sensation Elie Okobo, potentially giving them three difference-makers at three different positions.

If these picks pan out, the Suns just expedited their rebuilding process and made a slew of players expendable for future deals.

Michael Wynn: Jerry and Noah already made some great points. Considering that Atlanta was targeting Trae Young all along, to be able to snag him while simultaneously picking up a 1st-round pick next year was very savvy.

On the flip, Doncic could end up being the star of this draft, and passing on him may haunt them. Only time will tell.

I’d like to mention the Chicago Bulls as a team that got a lot better last night. Kris Dunn and Zach LaVine are the two guys they envision running their backcourt for the next 10 years or so. Lauri Markkanen was a sensational rookie PF last year.

Adding Wendell Carter (big man from Duke) and a really talented hybrid stretch forward like Chandler Hutchison is going to help this ball club immediately. I’ve seen a lot of Hutchison’s play while he was at Boise State, and he has ALL the tools to exceed at the next level.

Which Team Had the Worst Overall Draft?

ND: Technically, I could just say the Toronto Raptors, who didn’t have a single pick in the draft and have yet to improve on a team that hit a wall in the playoffs.

That’s too easy, so I’ll say the Los Angeles Clippers.

The Clips absolutely landed two talented players with the 11th and 13th picks in this draft, but one is a bit of a project, and the other was arguably a mild reach.

The Clips had two picks inside the lottery, yet they allowed Michael Porter Jr., Lonnie Walker, and a few other tantalizing prospects to slip through their grasp.

For me, it’s not that the Clips had a terrible draft, but that they failed to maximize it. At the point where they were, taking a stab on MPJ with one of those picks was an easy call, and they got scared away.

That, or the Clippers could have packaged these picks to trade up and land a potential superstar. I think Jerome Robinson and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander are fine prospects, but it’s quite possible L.A. blew a golden opportunity in this draft.

JS: Noah stole my Raptors joke, so I’m not sure how to start. On a more serious note, this one is a bit tough. I agree with Noah, and I think the Porter argument is valid for other teams as well.

They were wrong before with Porzingis, but I feel Knicks fans are probably right to be disappointed this time around. I think Kevin Knox is a risk at number 9. Sure, he is a solid player, but Michael Porter Jr. was the more obvious choice, despite his back problems.

Their other pick, Mitchell Robinson, is also a gamble. He decided to train on his own for a full season, and I’m not sure what to expect.

Mitchell Robinson Dunking
Robinson is a risky pick for the Clips.

Taking one risk would’ve been fine, especially with Robinson, but two are too many, if you ask me.

MW: Wow, these guys are good! Noah was spot-on with his point, and I agree with Jerry as well.

Come on, Clips, you got two picks in the top 13, and you pass on Michael Porter not once but twice?

I certainly think the Knicks had a plethora of better options than Knox, who hasn’t shown the enthusiasm on defense and doesn’t make anyone around him better.

I’ll go with the Washington Wizards as my choice for the team that had a chance to get better next year and may have dropped the ball. Their best players are John Wall, Brad Beal, and Otto Porter, guys that play the 1, 2, and 3.

So you’d think they would target some help inside with starting center Marcin Gortat already “99% out the door” according to all credible sources.

Instead, they inexplicably took a shooting guard (Troy Brown Jr.) who shot 29% from 3 last year and struggled to score around the basket.

They could have added a shot-blocking presence like Robert Williams or a shooting big man like Mo Wagner that could have stepped in and helped right away.

Then, with their other pick, they took an 18-year-old guard from Ukraine that likely won’t even come to America and join them for the next two years.

I think some fans in the DC area are scratching their heads for sure…

Which Pick Surprised You the Most?

MW: The Troy Brown pick to Washington made little sense to me for the reasons I listed above. I think they needed to add a big man, and failing to do so was a mistake.

But since that point was made, I’ll say the Magic taking Mohamed Bamba was surprising to me. I’m not saying this is the worst pick. I am saying it is the most surprising because it seems that the Magic’s 4/5 combo of Aaron Gordon and Nikola Vucevic is the one thing the team has going for them.

I assumed they would have added a guard, considering D.J. Augustin and Shelvin Mack are the only two PGs on their roster.

ND: I’m with Michael all the way here.

I won’t call Troy Brown a bad prospect, because he’s a good defender and has virtually everything you look for. He was just a really weird pick at 15 for the Wiz and for all of the reasons he went over.

That is high up there for me as far as surprising picks go, but the cream of the crop is Donte DiVincenzo to the Bucks at 17.

First off, I love this kid. People are down on him due to a lack of experience, but he went nuts in the national title game, and when given a chance, he was very productive for the best team in the country.

Beyond that, he’s a freak athlete that can fill it up from outside, is a willing defender, and rebounds very well for a guard.

He’s actually a great pick, but he’s also a shocking one.

Milwaukee’s biggest need was a big man, and with both Robert Williams and Mitchell Robinson available, I was shocked to see them go here.

I’m actually excited about it (can you tell I’m a Bucks fan yet?) because DiVincenzo is a shamefully underrated talent, but the Bucks made a move I 100% did not expect them to make.

JS: Guys, you really nailed this one, and there’s not much left for me. This is why I’m going to cheat and add a different angle here.

What surprised me the most was what happened with the 76ers and Mikal Bridges. A home boy, an excellent prospect, his mother works for them, and was in tears. It looked like a match made in heaven when he was picked.

You could see how excited the boy was, and I think you can’t buy the genuine loyalty and desire to play for your home club.

And of course, the 76ers then traded him. I feel for the boy, and this is a side of the sport I don’t like too much.

Which First-Round Pick Is Most Likely to Fail?

JS: I hope this is not where I get embarrassed by picking the next Michael Jordan!

I would have to pick Jerome Robinson for this one. He was able to show an excellent offense in an American Coast Conference stacked with talent.

However, there are big question marks about his athleticism and ability to defend. I think he will struggle on both ends in the NBA.

ND: I can honestly see both of the L.A. lottery picks being busts, but I won’t pick on the Clippers here by calling out both of their guys.

Instead, I’ll aim higher at Trae Young, who has a lot of work ahead of him if he’s to become the next Stephen Curry.

Trae Young
Trae Young – the next Jimmy Fredette?

To me, he’s a little more Jimmer Fredette than Curry, as he benefited from a ton of usage in college, and once defenses keyed in on him, he and his team struggled.

NBA players are going to eat up the opportunity to try to stop this kid, while exploiting him on the defensive end won’t just be a pleasure but fairly easy to accomplish.

Young can shoot and create, but he’s not strong, he doesn’t defend well, and he’s not an elite NBA athlete.

There is a path for him to be great, but I wouldn’t be shocked if he goes down the road that leads to bust central instead.

MW: I’ll go with Anfernee Simons.

Selected by the Portland Trailblazers with the 24th pick of the draft, the 6’3” 183-lb kid didn’t even play college ball, instead opting for the “5th year of high school” route at the IMG Academy. It’s already been stated that he needs time to develop, and that will likely come via the G League for the next two seasons.

The scouts have said that Anfernee struggled to dominate his lesser competition at the high school level a season ago, which doesn’t bode well for a transformation into and towards the NBA. He can score the basketball, but the Blazers already have pair of guards who excel at that.

Unless the Blazers are hellbent on shipping C.J. McCollum out of town, I would think that along with Damian Lillard, their backcourt is set for the time being. That means Simons is going to have a hard time finding minutes in the rotation—and that’s if and when he makes the official roster.

If he is going to end up contributing to the Blazers’ franchise, he has a lot of work ahead of him.

Who Was the Biggest Steal in Round 1?

ND: I feel exactly the same about Simons, so kudos to Michael on his previous answer.

Flipping the switch to the other side of things, the biggest steal was obviously Michael Porter Jr., and you could make an argument the Mavs stole Luka Doncic since they originally were picking from the 5 spot, too.

I’ll go one step further and suggest the next-biggest steal in the first round is actually Robert Williams.

I hate that so many people compare him to Stromile Swift, because that insinuates he’ll be a bust and/or that he can’t be special.

In reality, Williams is a dominant shot-blocker, can get easy buckets down low, and will clean the glass at a high rate. If he can develop a jumper and be more consistent, the Celtics may have found a serious steal at the end of round one.

JS: Noah is once again spot-on. Michael Porter Jr. is the logical choice here, and Doncic, to an extent, is as well. Outside of those two, it’s hard to pick.

I’m inclined to select Lonnie Walker IV. Spurs expected for him to be picked earlier than 18 and were prepared to trade for him. Considering their record, I would certainly trust Pop and the guys around him.

He is a bit raw but has good shooting and handling. The potential is there, and he is in the right organization.

MW: Great, and tremendously valid points.

The talent and youth in Boston combined with the exceptional coaching from Brad Stevens means that Robert Williams has everything he needs to succeed at the next level. An aging Al Horford as a mentor should work out famously.

I was planning on gushing about Lonnie Walker and the situation he wound up in, but Jerry covered that already!

My biggest steal in round 1 is Mikal Bridges, who the Suns essentially got with the 16th pick. First of all, Bridges was picked 10th overall by the 76ers, and the Suns traded their 16th pick for him by simply adding in a 2019 first-round pick that wasn’t even theirs in the first place.

They have a young star guard in Devin Booker and added the big man Ayton with their first pick. Adding a confident and capable wing player like Bridges, who is athletic and a great shooter, was a great move and one that should serve them well down the road.

Who Was the Biggest Reach in Round 1?

MW: I’ll go with Jaren Jackson Jr., the 4th pick by the Memphis Grizzlies.

Jackson averaged less than 11 points per game last year at Michigan State and just 5.8 rebounds per game. Much less than the 17 points/7 rebounds per game averages of his teammate Miles Bridges, who was selected 12th (then traded to Charlotte).

Not too impressive to a top 5 pick in the NBA Draft when you consider the wealth of talent that was sitting behind him.

Jackson seems a bit soft in the interior and has one ugly-looking jumper. There isn’t a lot to love in Memphis, and I could certainly see Jackson struggle, especially in the early going.

ND: Michael, I’m really glad you picked Jaren Jackson because everywhere I look, people love this kid. I see a raw project that could easily be a bust, so it’s comforting to know I’m not alone.

Jaren Jackson
Is Jaren Jackson over-hyped?

Jackson is one reach, but he at least is immensely talented and can learn behind Marc Gasol.

For me, the biggest reach is Jerome Robinson. There is also a mild argument for Collin Sexton, but Robinson felt more like a 20-25 pick, and the Clippers grabbed him at 13, two picks after getting a guard.

DeAndre Jordan is probably on his way out, which to me put Robert Williams directly in L.A.’s line of sight. I’ve also already vocalized my disdain for L.A. passing on Michael Porter Jr., Lonnie Walker, and others.

It’s not just about who the Clips passed up, though. Robinson is certainly skilled, but he’s largely a scorer who isn’t even amazing at isolation scoring, nor is he a freak athlete.

That’s potentially an awful combination, while the Clips took him at a position where Austin Rivers just opted back in, they just signed Lou Williams to an extension, and they have a slew of backups.

By all accounts, this was a mild reach in terms of talent and a big reach in terms of need and who the Clippers wound up passing up.

JS: Jaren Jackson is certainly a reach for a top 5 pick. He has the potential, but there’s a real danger for him to fail to reach his ceiling. I think you two talked enough about that already.

I think Troy Brown Jr. is a reach at 15. As Michael already said, he’s inconsistent and didn’t shoot well enough to convince me that he belongs that high.

Do Any 2nd-Round Picks Stand Out as Potential Stars?

JS: There are a couple of players that caught the eye in the second round, but I will go with Jalen Brunson. Honestly, he could end up being one of the top points guards from this generation.

He has solid shooting, and getting him alongside Doncic seems like a smart move. The Mavericks could build around those two in the future, and Dirk seems like an exceptional mentor.

ND: Nice call on Jalen Brunson, Jerry.

I’m a bit concerned his upside will be curbed, as he’ll surely be stuck behind both Doncic and Dennis Smith Jr., but I do think he could be a star if he ever winds up somewhere else.

He probably heads the list for round two, but I might prefer Elie Okobo, who lands in a better spot with the Suns.

Not only is the France product looking at a shot at a starting gig in Phoenix, but he’s actually a first-round talent that just slid into the second round.

Not a freak athlete by any means, Okobo is still fluid and packages solid playmaking with good court vision and a scorer’s mentality.

I don’t see a superstar, but he could be a quality starter down the road, which is all you can ask for in round two.

MW: When I am looking at 2nd-round picks that could turn out to be all-stars, it’s okay if the player needs a little grooming.

A guy like Melvin Frazier stands out to me as a player who may fit that mold. After emerging as one of the top – if not the top – perimeter defenders in this draft, the 6’6” player with a 7-foot wingspan has an incredible motor and will chase around the other team’s best player all game long.

The fact that he significantly improved his offensive game, namely his shooting percentages and ball handling skills this past season at Tulane, makes him a candidate as someone who may end up exceeding expectations.

The Magic may end up looking back at this pick as a huge steal.

I like Jalen Brunson a lot as well, by the way, and he is as proven as any player in this draft. But as Noah points out, with Dennis Smith and Luca Doncic, where are the minutes?

JS: It’s a good point. I guess I’m just thinking in terms of talent alone. If he gets the game time, he’s definitely got the ability to shine. Maybe he will eventually need a move for that to happen, though.

Which One Pick Would You Have Done Differently?

ND: This one is easy. Luka Doncic over Marvin Bagley.

Nothing against Bagley, as he projects like a Chris Bosh type of player, but he was not impressive defensively, and he will need to rely more on his shooting at the next level.

Doncic’s only realistic flaw is that he’s not some freak athlete. Neither is James Harden, yet he’s always found a way to look amazing.

This is the case for a lot of high-level NBA talents, as their actual skill-set tends to get them a lot further than their explosiveness.

Doncic gives you everything else: playmaking ability, outside shooting, creativity, leadership, and clutch ability.

The craziest part? The Kings already have some viable big men to work with. Meanwhile, the jury is still out on their perimeter talent.

Doncic was a game-changer, and the Kings passed on him.

If I’m running the Kings organization, I don’t commit that gaffe. I probably don’t draft Ben McLemore, Nik Stauskas, and freaking Georgios Papagiannis, either. But hey, that’s just me.

MW: So, Noah, is it safe to say that you wouldn’t have drafted Bismack Biyombo with the 7th pick and immediately swap him for Jimmer Fredette like Sacramento did in 2011??!!

ND: I can’t say I’d be that wise, no. I actually was a fan of The Jimmer coming out of college. Whoops!

MW: Haha. I’m all over your points here, though. I love Doncic and what he brings to the table. I think you can make a case that all four teams that essentially chose before Dallas passed on him, and maybe wrongly.

Without reiterating my point about the Wizards selecting a guard at 15 overall and passing on a crop of talented big men, I’ll opt for another pick I would have chosen differently.

If I was the Knicks at 9, no way I take a player who hasn’t shown the desire to compete on defense and doesn’t make any players around him better. The Knicks need to improve on all fronts, and I think a foundation piece like Mikal Bridges or Michael Porter made much more sense than Knox.

JS: Doncic over Bagley is my pick as well.

That one aside, I probably have to go for Troy Brown. Nothing personal against the guy, and we probably mentioned him too many times.

Troy Brown
Was Brown a bad pick for the Wizards?

However, Wizards simply don’t need a player like him. A big guy would’ve made so much sense, and there were options out there.

Michael already mentioned it, but Robert Williams seems like a much better fit. He could improve the team instantly and take the place of Gortat if he really goes.

Which Rookie Improves His Team’s Title Hopes the Most?

MW: Well, this one is tricky. If you are legitimately talking about title hopes, then Robert Williams would have to be the answer, as the Celtics are without a doubt in a position to strike this year.

I’ll go a bit outside the box here and go with the 26th pick, Landry Shamet.

I love what the 76ers have in place moving forward, especially if they can lock up J.J. Redick for at least the short term. I’m obviously not sold on the Markelle Fultz project, and after watching the 76ers compete in this past postseason, I thought there was just way too much pressure on Ben Simmons to constantly be handling the ball and making decisions.

Adding a true point guard that actually rated higher than Trae Young as the top offensive player in this draft should do wonders for Philly’s young squad. The attention will certainly be on Simmons and Embiid, so having a lock-down shooter who can be trusted like Shamet is the perfect fit.

JS: For a start, a team has to have title hopes in the first place. This is why I would go with Robert Williams III. Michael already suggested him, and I think this is the right answer here.

Some probably will be surprised to see a second-round pick here, but the ceiling of this guy is pretty solid, and Boston needs such a player.

He will help the frontcourt and was picked with defense in mind. Considering the whole roster of the Celtics, he could be a piece that makes the team a bit better, which could be enough to win the title.

ND: I can’t knock the Robert Williams or Landry Shamet picks, so Jerry and Michael get points there.

Boston is already very close to competing for a title, and had Kyrie Irving and Gordon Hayward both been healthy last year, perhaps we’d be having a very different conversation.

My pick is two-fold. If LeBron James stays in Cleveland, Collin Sexton could be just what the doctor ordered. Everyone says the Cavs are awful around King James, but the main thing he lacks is a second creator that can score on his own and set up other guys.

This would open things up for Cleveland, and if they also found a way to add one more guy, they could remain the favorite out of the Eastern Conference, and who knows – maybe give the Warriors a fight.

If James bolts, then I’ll just go with Jacob Evans. He’s a stingy defender that could be used right away, while we’re probably kidding ourselves by suggesting that anyone but Golden State is winning next year.

Who Is Your Early Pick for Rookie of the Year?

JS: It has got to be Luka Doncic. The guy has been playing against grown men ever since he was a kid.

He led Slovenia to win Eurobasket, was MVP of the final four this year with Real Madrid in the Euroleague, and looks like a generational talent.

On top of that, I feel the Mavericks are a great place for him. They already have a European superstar in Dirk, and he will help him settle.

I can easily see him getting a lot of minutes and contributing to a possible return to the playoffs.

Of course, he’s not that athletic, and the level in Europe is different, so he might have a bit of a tough start. Still, I feel he is just too talented to ignore.

ND: Jerry stole our Thunder, I’m sure, as Luka Doncic is the fun favorite right away for Rookie of the Year.

However, Bovada actually gives bettors insane value with DeAndre Ayton (+265) leading the way.

DeAndre Ayton
DeAndre Ayton for ROTY?

I don’t see much reason to stray from that. The only true knocks on Ayton are that his drive/focus aren’t always where they need to be, and he isn’t a proven defender.

Last time I checked, neither were needed to beat out what amounts to a fairly weak rookie class.

On the flip side, Ayton is a man-eater on offense and has developing range on his jumper. Whether he’s Anthony Davis, Boogie Cousins, Joel Embiid, Karl-Anthony Towns, or something else, he’s going to be amazing, and he’s probably going to win this thing.

There are other threats like Doncic, Kevin Knox, Wendell Carter, Marvin Bagley, and Trae Young, but why get cute with it?

MW: My pick for Rookie of the Year isn’t necessarily who I think is the best player…

But if Atlanta ships out Dennis Schroder (which at this point is looking like a near certainty), then Trae Young will have been handed the keys to the entire offense. The efficiency and wins might not be there, and as Noah mentioned, opposing guards should be able to attack him with ease.

But if he is playing 32+ minutes a game and chucking up tons of 3s, it’s not out of the question that he could average 20 points and 7 assists per game. That could be more than enough to take home ROY honors.

Summary

So, there you have it. There was plenty of consensus among our NBA experts here, but a few differences of opinions, too. I certainly enjoyed listening to these guys, and I hope you enjoyed reading what they had to say.

The excitement of the draft is still very fresh, but it seems like a long time now until the season starts. Don’t worry, though, as we’ll help you to fill the time by adding numerous NBA-themed posts on the blog between now and October.

You can expect more insight and analysis from our experts, and they’ll be looking at the various betting opportunities, too.

Another good use of the offseason is to think about where you’re going to place your wagers once the new season comes around. If you live in the US, the recent changes in betting laws mean you may have more options than ever before.

However, this all depends on whether the state you live in moves quickly enough to introduce the necessary legislation.

Regardless of where you live, you’ve always got the option of betting online. Just make sure that you stick to reputable and trustworthy sites. You can always to refer our list of the top NBA betting sites if you need to.

For now, why not let us know what YOU made of the 2018 NBA Draft? We always like to know what our readers are thinking, so please feel free to submit your comments below and share your opinions.

The post Talking Points from the 2018 NBA Draft – What Happened and What It All Means appeared first on GamblingSites.com.

Share:

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Recent Posts